Critical Regionalism seeks to incorporate an opposing
approach to design which mediates between universal technology and local
customs of architecture. The problematic nature of the relationship between industrialization
and traditional cultures and techniques arises when the economy seeks to
commercialize our connection to nature.1 Sacrificed in a dense urban
and suburban fabric, Tadao Ando seeks to revitalise the connection between
nature and building characteristic of Japanese architecture through the sensory
experience.
Ando incorporates this through adopting the open
vocabulary of Modernism in the enclosed area of regional differentiation,
attempting to conserve and express the culture’s customs, sensibilities and
social traditions.2 Emphasis is placed upon tectonic form and
tactile sensations of illumination, topography, ambience and climate instead of
scenography and focusing just upon visuals.3
In his small courtyard houses, Ando uses concrete for
its homogeneous surface and how light affects the surface rather than focusing
upon the material’s weight. This spatial limpidity is created through the sense
of walls becoming abstract and negated as these surfaces become comprehensible
through the sunlight.4 The tactile and ambient nature of the
architecture thus succeeds in transcending the initial perception of its solid
geometry. In Koshino House (1980-1984), whilst the exterior is a blank concrete
walled façade, the interior corridor is punctuated by narrow openings exposing
and expressing the play of light and shadow.
Material selections and fundamental details, enforced
by local economies, are geographically diversified through the regional
variation of the economic-technological tide.5 Recognising the
disjointed way of life of Japan in the post war period, Ando’s interplay of
light, material, space and detail is reminiscent of traditional Japanese
farmhouses (minka) where distinct contrasts are made between light and shadow
through the strategically placed clerestories.6 Critical regionalism
initiates a return to sensory experience and perception in a century dominated
by media and information.7
Footnotes
1. Alan
Colquhoun “Critique of Regionalism,” in Vincent Canizaro, ed., Architectural
Regionalism: Collected Writings on Place, Identity, Modernity and Tradition (New
York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2007), 145.
2. Tadao Ando, “From Self Enclosed Modern Architecture
Towards Universality,” Japan Architect,
301
May 1962, 8-12.
3. Kenneth Frampton, Modern Architecture (London: Thames & Hudson Ltd, 2007), 327.
4. Ibid, 324.
5. Richard
J. Neutra, “Regionalism in Architecture”in Vincent Canizaro, ed., Architectural
Regionalism: Collected Writings on Place, Identity, Modernity and Tradition (New
York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2007), 278.
6. Xianghua Wu, Concrete Resistance: Ando in the context of critical regionalism,48-341:
History of Architectural Theory, May 10 2006, pg 7
Image Credits
1. General View (Koshino House), Gonzalo Perez. 2011, photograph. Available: Archdaily, http://www.archdaily.com/161522/ad-classics-koshinohouse-tadao-ando/ (accessed October 11, 2013).
2. Corridor (Koshino House), Gonzalo Perez. 2011, photograph. Available: Archdaily, http://www.archdaily.com/161522/ad-classics-koshino-housetadao-ando/ (accessed October 11, 2013).
3. Row House, Unknown. 2013, photograph. Available: ArchiTravel, http://www.architravel.com/architravel/building/row-house-azuma-house/ (accessed October 11, 2013).
No comments:
Post a Comment